All Dolled Up: The Rich Using the Dollhouse to Fill Their Needs
Jeff Frank
10/4/12
Dollhouse is a spooky psychological
thriller. Written and directed by creator Joss Whedon it follows a few main
characters as they have their minds wiped repeatedly and then replaced by
information that the rich want imprinted upon the Dolls for those peoples own
sick and twisted demands. The Dollhouse is run by Adele Dewitt a no nonsense
person who is ruthless and straightforward in her business tactics towards the
people who want the services of the Dollhouse. Topher has the unenviable task
of imprinting and erasing all the Actives that are used. As the Dolls fight
their way to regaining a somewhat normal life again they are lead by Echo who
seems to be the person who can best resist the continual imprinting by the
Dollhouse. A FBI agent by the name of Paul Ballard becomes aware of the vile
acts performed by the Dollhouse and the actual personality of Echo to be
Caroline Farrell. He knows he needs to save her and anyone else that is under
the control of the Dollhouse. As Paul gets close to discovering the Dollhouse
they begin to spy on him and send various people or Actives attempting to kill
him. Someone in the Dollhouse was able to infiltrate the technology that is
imprinted on the Dolls, or Actives as they are also called, and is able to send
Paul some messages about helping Echo and the others when she is sent to
assassinate him. Along the way Paul is assisted by numerous people including
Actives and impeded by many difficult tasks and adversaries as well.
The
first scene is where Joel Mynor hires Echo to show up at his newly bought house
imprinted to be Joel’s wife. Mynor stands on his lawn as bodyguards inspect the
property he is preparing to show off to his wife. As one guard checks around
the back of the property he turns the corner where Paul is aiming a gun at him
while simultaneously hushing him. The scene switches to Joel’s wife pulling up
and Joel meeting her on the front lawn and beginning to explain the situation.
When it goes back to Paul and the guard they begin to fight and Paul easily
knocks the other man unconscious. Ballard then sneaks in the back door of the
residence where the couple can be over heard flirting in the kitchen. He then
confronts them in the kitchen, as Joel and Echo are about to open champagne.
Paul is surprised upon seeing Echo close the refrigerator door. Mynor and Echo
are confused as to why Ballard is there and what he wants. Another of the
guards subdues Ballard with a Taser and as he tries to take him away Paul
elbows him and knocks him out. Several other men attack Ballard and he defeats
them all. Echo’s handler, Boyd Langton, takes her away for a “treatment.”
Ballard and Mynor sit at the kitchen and table to discuss how and why he would
do such a thing. Mynor’s initial reasons sound noble and he had heartfelt
intentions to impress his deceased wife. At the end of the conversation Ballard
asks Mynor if he was going to use Echo for sex. Mynor responded with, “well it
is a fantasy.”
This
scene shows a very distinct case of human trafficking. Joel Mynor pays a huge
sum of money in order for an unknowing person to come to his house and fulfill
his fantasy. Although he has a sort of sob story that influenced his decision
to do what he did and pay for a random person to have her memory wiped and show
up with an imprint of being his stunned wife seeing their new house for the
first time. His actions still are not validated by his intentions. Mynor was
still planning to have sex with Echo knowing that she was not his wife. The
guards that came to protect Mynor when Paul Ballard broke in prove that they
are running an operation that is most likely illegal. Also, the fact that Boyd
Langton also pulled Echo out of the situation cautioning that she needs a
treatment also lends one to believe that the Dollhouse’s acts are anything but
an unjust act.
Scene
two starts with Sierra and several other Dolls walking down a hallway towards
their living quarters. Sierra seems a little more distracted than the rest of
the Actives in this area. When the rest of the Dolls are out of sight Sierra
walks up to a glass wall and a panel slides back revealing a room. She enters,
the panel slides back and another silhouette walks up to join her on the other
side of the wall. The unknown man asks Sierra, “Do you trust me?” She responds,
“with my life.” He asks if she wants to play the game and she declines. He then
reminds her not to make noise during this game. As he removes his jacket he
tells Sierra to lift up her dress. Right as he removes his jacket Boyd Langton
punches him through the glass panel.
This
scene shows how individuals involved in human trafficking and sex trafficking
are sometimes to scared of the possible consequences of speaking up either to
the person advancing on them or to someone else and seek help. In Sierra’s case
this is not the only time that Joe Hearn had attempted and successfully had
sexual interactions with her. She knows that she does not want it to happen but
does not know any better to stop it. Joe Hearn is the only person that should
know better than to advance on an unwilling and an un-wanting girl like Sierra.
Boyd Langton was the only one that knew the right choice and he made it in
order to keep Sierra getting anymore emotionally damaged.
The writers of Dollhouse use the many
instances of people using Dolls to fulfill their fantasies to argue that, since
the Dolls can’t make decisions for themselves, those people imposing their
wills upon the Dolls are morally wrong because they are using another unknowing
human for their own personal pleasure. In the first scene we see that Joel
Mynor used his immense wealth as a popular children's cartoon creator to create
a fantasy world for himself. The second scene shows that the Dolls cannot make
decisions for themselves because she does not try and stop Joe Hearn from
making sexual advances upon her. The real world implications of this argument
are that human trafficking is a worldwide problem that affects more people than
most realize. Many families are torn apart due to this atrocity and for some it
is the only option to survive. In Eastern Asia millions of individuals and
families are ruined by being forced into the world of human trafficking. While
people may acknowledge that this happens, they do little as a whole to try and
prevent it.
As
aforementioned human trafficking is one of the many atrocities that occur in
todays world that affects an estimated 9.5 million people all around the globe.
There following two articles help back up the claim that human trafficking is
an awful occurrence and should be eliminated as quickly as possible with
minimal damage to the lives of the affected and to all the countries involved.
The first article is titled Human
Trafficking by David A. Feinberg. In this article he focuses more on the
labor trafficking aspect and how it is a very difficult process trying to find
a possible solution for this problem. The second article titled Prevention Prosecution Protection was
written by Ruth Dearnley and Steven Chalke. This article focuses a little more
on the sex trafficking aspect and how in someway everyone around the world is
affected by it.
David
A. Feinberg is an accredited anthropologist and filmmaker that has seen the
horrible truths of human trafficking firsthand. He received his Ph.D. in those
arts while studying at Dartmouth, Yale, and Columbia. After a three-year study
in Southeast Asia Dr. Feingold cofounded the Institute for the Study of Human
Issues (ISHI), the first research cooperative in the U.S. Dr. Feinberg backs up
the analysis of the first scene with several instances. Paul Ballard is a FBI
agent and wants to bring Joel Mynor in for facilitating and participating in an
act of human trafficking. Dr. Feinberg states in his article that government
sanctions trying to control human trafficking would not work because the threat
of sanctions could lead to backfires from those countries in the form of
reduced civility and in some cases even violent backlashes. Just like in Paul
Ballard’s case when he confronts Joel Mynor the guards attack him and when he
threatens Mynor the police sirens in the background that are coming to arrest
Ballard for breaking and entering and assault.
Ruth
Dearnley and Steve Chalke are the CEO of Stop the Traffik and founder of Stop
the Traffik respectively. Chalke is also a special advisor on Community Action
against Human Trafficking in the organization UN.GIFT. Stop the Traffik is a
global movement of individuals, communities, and organizations fighting to
prevent human trafficking around the world. Their article relates to the second
scene where Joe Hearn tries to make a sexual advance on Sierra who does not
know what is going on but knows she does not want to participate in the acts
that Hearn is alluding to. In the article the two authors state that the
majority of human trafficking goes unnoticed by society. This statement is
validated when Sierra is walking down the hall with the others and when she
peels off to meet Hearn they don’t even notice. Also, this is not the first
time that Sierra has been forced into performing these acts.
Dr.
Feinberg has numerous firsthand accounts of human trafficking from his time
spent abroad in regions like Southeast Asia. He also has witnessed how human
trafficking in the U.S. and how it has destroyed the lives of the person being
trafficked and the family of that person. Ruth Dearnley and Steve Chalke are a
huge part of organizations whose soul purpose is to end human trafficking and
the horrible effects that it has on all the people involved. In both articles
the authors are completely against human trafficking, whether it is happening
abroad or on domestic soil. The authors also agree that there is no single
simple way of eliminating human trafficking due to how well it is hidden or
protected by underground organizations. The fight against human trafficking needs
work if it there is hope of controlling it or even stopping all together.
Works
Cited
"Documentary
Educational Resources." DER Filmmaker: David A. Feingold.
Documentary Educational Resources, n.d. Web. 05 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.der.org/films/filmmakers/david-feingold.html>.
"Human
Trafficking." Foreign Policy 150 (2005): 26-32. Business Source
Complete. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.
“Man on the Street.” Dollhouse: Season 1. Writ. Joss Whedon. Dir. David Straiton. Fox.
20 March 2009.
“Prevention,
Prosecution and Protection.” 47 U.N.
Chron. 52 (2010): 52-55. 5 Oct. 2012.
"What
Is Human Trafficking?" STOP THE TRAFFIK. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Oct.
2012. <http://www.stopthetraffik.org/who-we-are>.
1.Great title and subtitle has direct meaning and tells what argument may be about.
ReplyDelete2. According to the peer review paper, the show should not be mentioned. (Doesn't make sense to me, but oh well).
ReplyDelete3. -1st scene: gives a great description of the show. Shows they know something illegal is going on.
ReplyDelete-Scene 1 Analysis: Shows what you comprehended from the scene and your claim is direct in the first sentence. Human trafficking is being shown
-2nd scene:great description.
-Scene 2 analysis: clear claim in the paragraph, that people sometimes do not speak up.
4. In your implications paragraph, your argument is stated as such:"those people imposing their wills upon the Dolls are morally wrong "
ReplyDeleteYour argument is clearly written in the 1st sentence.
5. Your real world connection is human trafficking in Eastern Asia.
ReplyDeleteHuman trafficking in Eastern Asia is morally wrong because...... - May want to add and be more clear/direct to why human trafficking is morally wrong in Eastern Asia to your Implications paragraph.
6. Great background added to the sources. Didnt see any quotes in the SSI or any cited sources!!
ReplyDeleteI like how you wrote about the source/real world connection and then explained how it related to the show/scene.
QUOTES QUOTES QUOTES
7. Your research does prove that the real world connection displays your argument as well as adding multiple background facts to accredit the sources. May want to add more of why the real world connection is like the argument your proving.
ReplyDelete8. Didn't see much of a conclusion section of the paper. -Transition back to the show -Render and introduce a new scene -analyze the show and make another claim maybe similar to the others -Apply any advice and connect to your real world connection -restate argument and maybe the advice and what would happen if your advice was taken
ReplyDelete9. May want to add more context from your title as you say "the rich". Or you may want to rearrange your title. Introduction well gives a brief description and forewarning to what the paper will be about.
ReplyDelete10. Works cited: didn't see any sources cited or any quotes. Works cited doesn't need to be underlined. Other than that the works cited looks great.
ReplyDelete11. I saw a few grammatical errors. Take a sec and read it back to yourself to find those errors. Make sure you add quotes from your sources and work on transitions from PSA to SSI to the conclusion. Didn't see much of a conclusion also.
ReplyDelete