The introduction to my paper will be about my argument that "The writers of Firefly use the actions of Mal and his crew to argue that it is unfair to assume that a person who commits a crime is necessarily immoral because we are unaware of the situation that may have forced them into committing the crime"
My scene 1 will be the scene where Mal returns the medicine.
My analysis of scene 1 will talk about how Mal was doing the morally right thing by returning the medicine.
My scene 2 will be when Mal wants to return their share of the money back to Nikolai and is men
My analysis of this scene will talk about how Mal wanted to do the right thing because they didn't actually complete the mission and give the medicine to Nikolai.
My real world connection will be about michael Vick and how he was convicted for killing all those dogs and that now that he has been released he is doing all of these great things in the community (Philadelphia) and has been described as being very humble and such now. And also I'll find another story about how a criminal did good after committing a crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment